Oscar Hijuelos plans companion novel to his famous work

February 10, 2008

By AP Wire Services
2/10/2008

NEW YORK (AP) — Oscar Hijuelos is writing a companion novel to his Pulitzer Prize-winning “The Mambo Kings Play Songs of Love” and also plans a memoir that will include his encounters with such musicians as Ruben Blades and Lou Reed.

The two books were announced jointly last week by Hyperion Books, which will publish the novel (“Beautiful Maria of My Soul”), and Gotham Books, an imprint of Penguin Group (USA) that will release his memoir, “Thoughts Without Cigarettes.”

The son of Cuban immigrants, the 56-year-old Hijuelos became the fi rst Hispanic to win the fi ction Pulitzer when he was cited for “Mambo Kings,” which came out in 1990 and tells the story of musicians- brothers Nestor and Cesar Castillo.

The novel, which imagines the Castillos making a guest appearance on “I Love Lucy,” has sold more than 300,000 copies and was made into a feature fi lm and a musical.

“Beautiful Maria,” scheduled to come out in 2009, will focus on Nestor’s great love and inspiration of the Castillo’s most famous song, “Beautiful Maria of My Soul.

Hijuelos’ memoir is expected in 2010. His previous books include the novels “Our House in the Last World” and “Mr. Ives’ Christmas.”


Top Latino Books of 2007

December 15, 2007

Authors pick their 2007 favorite books

Carlos Rodríguez Martorell
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Friday, December 14th 2007, 2:21 PM

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that in a list of the best Latino books of the year, “The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao,” by Junot Díaz, got the most votes.

But Viva’s second annual favorites-of-the-year survey also proves that there is much more out there to discover in the Latino literary scene — in and outside the U.S., in English and Spanish.

To help you browse through an endless array of novelties, we asked 12 leading authors to name their favorite book of the year, and to let us peek into what they have in store for 2008.

EDUARDO LAGO (Spain-New York City)
His 2006 debut novel “Llámame Brooklyn” won Spain’s Nadal and National Critics’ prizes, and was voted best Latino book in last year’s Viva list.

PICKS: “The Art of Political Murder,” Francisco Goldman: “A very rigorous investigative work about political corruption in Guatemala, which also serves as a metaphor for all Latin America.”

“The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao,” Junot Díaz: “A miracle in the current culture of junk entertainment.”

JUNOT DíAZ (New York City-Dominican Republic)
Author of the literary event of the year “The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao,” which is raking in the awards, including best novel by New York and Time magazines – and Viva. “Hopefully next year I’ll actually start writing something else. Something longer than five pages.”

PICKS: “A Chance in Hell,” Gilbert Hernández: “A terrifying graphic novel. Couldn’t put it down, so disturbing and merciless.”

“El Olor de la Memoria,” Rhina Espaillat: “Tender, cunning, ravishingly beautiful.”

FRANCISCO GOLDMAN (New York City-Guatemala)
Twice a PEN/Faulkner award finalist for his novels, this year he published the non-fiction “The Art of Political Murder: Who killed the Bishop?” about the murder of the Guatemalan Bishop Gerardi in 1998.

PICKS: “Oscar Wao”: “Tremendous and trailblazing.”

“Lost City Radio,” Daniel Alarcón: “Lucid, terrifying, poetic and brilliant.”

LUIS ALBERTO URREA (Naperville, Ill.-Mexico)
Pulitzer Prize nonfiction finalist for 2005’s “The Devil’s Highway,” he’s finishing a “comedic epic novel” about immigration. “I’ll embark on ‘Hummingbird’s Daughter II’ [a followup to his best-selling 2006 novel] and complete the editing on a new volume of poems.”

PICK: “The Faith Healer of Olive Avenue,” Manuel Muñoz: “An extraordinary writer with immense promise.”

JULIA ÁLVAREZ (Middlebury, Vt.-Dominican Republic)
Author of the celebrated novel “How the García Girls Lost Their Accents,” next summer she’ll be touring with her latest book, “Once Upon A Quinceañera.” “I’m working on a new book for young readers of all ages.”

PICKS: “Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza,” Gloria Anzaldua (Reissued in 2007): “She really gave us, especially Latinas, the vocabulary and framework with which to understand ourselves as hybrid beings.”

“The Faith Healer of Olive Avenue,” Manuel Muñoz: “Muñoz maps out a culture and community of central California in interlocking stories that have moody mysteriousness and tenderness about them.”

PABLO DE SANTIS (Argentina)
Winner of this year’s first Planeta-Casa de América Ibero-American Narrative Prize for “El Enigma de París.” “I’m finishing with filmmaker Juan Pablo Buscarini the screenplay for the movie ‘El inventor de juegos,’ based on a novel of mine.”

PICKS: “La Muerte Lenta de Luciana B.” Guillermo Martínez: “A suffocating thriller where two versions of truth collide.”

“Los Hombres Invisibles,” Mario Mendoza: “Mendoza keeps masterfully mixing reality and fiction.”


EDMUNDO PAZ SOLDÁN
(Ithaca, N.Y.-Bolivia)
Winner of the 2002 Bolivian National Book Award for “Turing’s Delirium.” “I’m finishing a short novel, the first one set completely in the U.S. In February I will co-edit a book of essays about [Chilean writer] Roberto Bolaño.”

PICK: “Oscar Wao”: “It has everything for the demanding reader. Bursting with humor … It’s also the modern, painful story of the Dominican Republic and an account of the survival of many Latino immigrants in the U.S.”

ACHY OBEJAS (Chicago-Cuba)
Journalist and author of “Days of Awe,” and editor of this year’s detective stories compilation, “Havana Noir.” “I’m finishing the translation into Spanish of Junot’s book, and a collection of my own stories. And I’m on the threshold of completing a new novel.”

PICK: “Oscar Wao”: “It mixes high and low culture, history and invention, wicked humor and genuine sentiment.”

ROBERTO AMPUERO (Des Moines, Iowa-Chile)
Author of the best-selling “Pasiones Griegas” and a popular series featuring Cuban detective Cayetano Brulé. “I’m working on a new novel, to be published next year [and] following closely the filming of ‘Nuestros Años Verde Olivo,’ about one of my novels.”

PICKS: “La razón de los amantes,” Pablo Simonetti: “An extremely elegant psychological novel about a heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual love triangle in modern Santiago de Chile’s upper class.”

“El misterio de las Tanias,” Sebastian Edwards: “Whoever likes Latin American spy novels has to read this one.”

ANGIE CRUZ
(New York City)
Author of the celebrated Washington Heights chronicle “Let It Rain Coffee.” “I have adapted my first novel, ‘Soledad,’ for the screen and I am at work on the third novel, ‘In Search of Caridad.’”

PICK: “Handbook of Luck,” Cristina García: “Hilarious storytelling and a mix of complex characters that engage the reader in larger political and historical events.”

MARY CASTILLO
(Orange County, Calif.)
Mexican-American author of chica lit novels such as “Hot Tamara.” “I plan to write two new books … Also, I’ve adapted my novel ‘Switchcraft’ into a screenplay.”

PICK: “It’s Not About the Accent,” Caridad Ferrer. “Women of all ages can relate to her journey of self-discovery.”

JORGE FRANCO (Colombia)
Author of the acclaimed novel “Rosario Tijeras” (2004). The film adaptation of his “Paraíso Travel,” starring John Leguizamo, will premiere in January. He’s working on a new novel and writing a film adaptation of his first novel, “Mala Noche.”

PICK: “El Enigma de París,” Pablo de Santis: “It exalts the detective genre in a universal setting, but with a very Latin-American undertone.”


James Baldwin 20th Anniversary Commemoration

December 9, 2007

James Baldwin 20th Anniversary Commemoration: Remembering the Life and Work of the Legendary Writer and Civil Rights Activist

James Baldwin, the legendary African American writer and civil rights activist, died 20 years ago this week. This Sunday in Harlem, the Schomburg Center for Research on Black Culture is holding a 20th anniversary commemoration.

We take a look at Baldwin’s life and his work with his sister-in-law Carole Weinstein, and we hear Baldwin in his own words. We also hear Tony Award-nominated actor Calvin Levels performing a part of his acclaimed one-man show, “James Baldwin: Down from the Mountaintop.”

Full Article


Junot Diaz savors debut novel’s success

October 17, 2007

nydailynews.com

Junot Diaz savors debut novel’s success

BY CARLOS RODRÍGUEZ MARTORELL

Junot Díaz is savoring the raving success of his debut novel — briefly.

“The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao” has made it to the New York Times Best Sellers list (a first for a Dominican author), Miramax Films bought the screen rights and a translation into Spanish is already in the works.

“This is just a temporary change after 11 years in silence and solitude,” Díaz deadpans, referring to the time it took for the book to see the light after his acclaimed “Drown.”

“All this stuff is really nice but nothing is gonna make me happy until I can figure out a way to write more easily than I write now.”

Díaz is not very hopeful about the movie. “Hollywood is Hollywood,” he says. “It would be wonderful if it was brilliant, and it would be wonderful if it was made. But that’s not usually what happens.”

The novel revolves about Oscar, an obese comics fan growing up in Paterson, N.J., and his dysfunctional Dominican family, going back to the Rafael Trujillo dictatorship.

The book is being translated by Cuban author Achy Obejas.

In the novel, Díaz takes on so many genres that it makes it almost impossible to imagine what the movie would look like. Comedy? Epic? Sci-fi?

“Structurally, the perfect director would be the director who made ‘Babel’ and ‘Amores Perros’ [Alejandro González Iñárritu], because he knows how to juggle different story lines,” he said. “I also really love that director who did ‘Secuestro Express’ [Jonathan Jakubowicz].”

As for the cast, he can’t think of any actor to play Oscar, but ventures two options for his fierce “ghetto-punk” sister, Lola.

“Minimum, we have two Dominican actresses who are tall and beautiful and [a bit] morenita, and that’s Dania Ramírez and, of course, Zoë Saldaña.”

He has another sure pick: “A friend of mine wrote that the best Trujillo would be Oscar de la Renta, and I think she’s right. I think it would be genius.”

Díaz says he’s working on a novel about a woman raised an orphan who goes back to her native city, which has been destroyed in a terrorist attack.

“Oscar didn’t sound funny either when I first described him,” he said. “My problem as a writer is that I always take the strangest route to my destination.”


Trujillo meets Tolkien on Junot Diaz’s long-awaited first novel

September 29, 2007

nydailynews.com

Trujilo meets Tolkien on Junot Diaz’s long-awaited first novel

BY CAROLINA GONZÁLEZ

Junot Díaz’s 1996 literary debut, “Drown,” turned him into the “it” writer of the New York literary scene — Latino or not.

But the short-story collection that made the name of the Dominican-American writer came out over a decade ago, an eternity in the dog years of publishing. How could he possibly follow it up?

His long-awaited debut novel, “The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao,” (Riverhead, $24.95) is an ambitious family saga paved with political violence, historic curses, comic books and unrequited love.

“I wanted to play with the conventions of the multigenerational family novel,” said Díaz. “I’m looking to entertain myself. A mí me gusta joder.”

“Oscar Wao,” released Thursday, has fans and the publishing industry salivating. The novel leads the “BEA Buzzometer” for fall releases in the industry Web site Publishers Marketplace.

Does the novel live up to the hype? Yes. Absolutely.

Anti-hero Oscar de León (no relation to the salsero of the same name) is what Díaz has dubbed a “ghetto-nerd,” a bookish, comics-loving, obese teen hopelessly in love with one alluring Latina after another. His nickname “Wao” comes from the Dominican pronunciation of “Oscar Wilde.”

His sister Lola, a rebellious punk rocker and athlete, gives him some harsh, but needed advice: “Oscar … you’re going to die a virgin unless you start changing.”

But as compelling as Oscar’s plight is, his is not the only story we follow. There is their fierce mother, Belicia de León, and their grandmother living in the Dominican Republic, known as La Inca.

“A book about love, heterosexual love, about a male tragic figure, lives or dies by its women characters,” said Díaz. “I was, as a kid, un enamorao. I’m comfortable being around women on their terms.”

The story swings back and forth between Paterson, N.J., and the Dominican Republic, the two places where Díaz grew up.

“I wanted to create a book that encompassed a particular family’s post-WWII moment in the Dominican diaspora,” he said.

The narrator of the story, Yuniol, is suspiciously similar to a character by the same name in the “Drown” stories. And in some ways, Yuniol resembles Díaz himself. But the author is quick to point out that he is not Yuniol. “Yuniol and Oscar are ‘almost-me’s,’ ” he said.

A self-described ghettonerd, Díaz said that the two characters are flip sides of the same coin. Like Yuniol, he could have gotten into trouble with his more “hoodlum” friends, or “I could have turned into Oscar in two seconds.”

The structure of the novel also strays from the typical family melodrama. Interruptions, sidebars and footnotes abound.

The Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo — who ruled the country with an iron fist from 1930 until his assassination in 1961 — is compared with science-fiction and fantasy villains such as Sauron from the “Lord of the Rings” novels. And the “fukú,” a curse supposedly brought into the New World by Columbus, hangs over all the characters, especially Oscar.

This sense of playing with convention is what Díaz finds missing from much of contemporary Latino literature. He believes many writers merely adopt literary clichés rather than challenging them.

“I never understood how you could have a multigenerational family drama and be so un-nutritious,” he said.

Even popular forms like the telenovela are more willing to mess with their formulas, he said. “Novela [soap opera] writers don’t seem to have a problem playing.”

To the inevitable question of why did it take so long for the followup, Díaz said that he has been writing at least three different projects that hit dead ends.

But he said he will take up one of those novels, a science-fiction project, during a year-long fellowship in Rome from the American Academy of Arts and Letters, which he will start after the book tour ends.

For the year, he will take a leave of absence as a writing professor at MIT in Cambridge, Mass., a job he will surely miss. When he’s not teaching, he lives in East Harlem.

“As an activist and human being I think it’s a sacred function to mentor and teach,” he said. “It’s one of the ways I give back.”


The price of the ticket

July 15, 2007

The price of the ticket

In 1953, James Baldwin, a hard-up writer in Paris, published the extraordinary novel Go Tell it on the Mountain. Four years later he sailed home to the United States to immerse himself in the civil rights movement.

Caryl Phillips explores the historic consequences of his return

In July 1957, an ocean liner set sail from France to New York and on board was the 32-year-old, James Baldwin. Nine years earlier, he had made the reverse journey and left his native New York City for Paris with $40 in his pocket and no knowledge of either France or the French language. He had chosen Paris because his mentor, Richard Wright, was living there, having sought refuge from the demeaning racial politics of his homeland.

The young James Baldwin felt that if he was ever going to discover himself as a man and a writer, then he would also have to flee the United States.

Full Article


Muslim novelist takes a stand

April 24, 2007

dallasnews.com

Muslim novelist takes a stand

BOOKS: Writer wants to get post-Sept. 11 ‘conversation’ going

By JOHN FREEMAN / Special Contributor to The Dallas Morning News

NEW YORK CITY – In the 5 ½ years since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Western world has been through a crash course on terrorism and radical Islam at its bookstores. And it’s not just journalists or historians doing the teaching. A growing number of novels have addressed the fallout of terrorism, from John Updike’s Terrorist to Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close.

But now we have a literary first: a novel about post-9/11 America by a Muslim writer. Right away he is singing a slightly different tune.

“As horrible and wrong as they were,” Mohsin Hamid says, “the attacks of 9/11 were a voice in a conversation. Something terrible was speaking to America, and immediately it was taken in at political levels which responded, ‘We don’t want to hear that.’ “

When Susan Sontag made similar comments in The New Yorker two weeks after the attacks, she was widely criticized as unpatriotic and inappropriate.

Sitting at a hotel bar in lower Manhattan, Mr. Hamid, 36, believes now is the time for that conversation to be picked up again. He hopes his second novel, The Reluctant Fundamentalist, will help.

The novel unfolds in the voice of Changez, a Pakistani man in a Lahore cafe, telling his life story to an off-stage American, who may – or may not – be a CIA agent come to kill him. Over a series of short, monologuelike chapters, Changez describes how he traveled to America on a scholarship, performed well enough at Princeton to earn a coveted consulting job and then quickly climbed the corporate ladder.

But Changez becomes so obsessed with fitting in he loses himself – a fact mirrored by the desperate lengths to which he goes to secure the affection of a white American woman.

“It’s not the story of someone who begins hating something,” says Mr. Hamid, eager to make it known this is not an America-bashing book. “It’s somebody who loves something so much that they are willing to do things which, upon reflection, when their love is rejected, feel demeaning.”

Mr. Hamid knows how Changez feels. He moved to the United States to attend Princeton University and Harvard Law School, later working for some years at the McKinsey consulting group in Manhattan – a famously competitive firm.

Mr. Hamid says burnout – and a feeling of having sold out – was endemic. As a Pakistani man, though, Mr. Hamid’s malaise had a sharper, more intimate angle. He watched as the United States used its power to leverage Pakistan in its nuclear race with India. Like his character, he was mistaken for being Arab. Watching post-9/11 America cheer on the invasion of Muslim countries was painful.

It was doubly painful because Mr. Hamid had lived in California as a boy. His family returned to Pakistan, but he came to the States for college. To this day, he says, “I cannot separate my Americanness out of me.”

Mr. Hamid believes what’s true about himself goes for the world at large, even the parts that look on the United States with disgust. There are even American echoes in the tenets of radical Islam, especially, he believes, martyrs who cast themselves as heroes.

“Much of the world thinks of itself in filmic, narrative and cultural ways that are heavily influenced by America,” he says. The bombers think of themselves as “the knights errant of the modern day. Instead of slaying dragons, they slay 3,000 innocent people. The failure to grasp the Americanness of all this means the U.S. doesn’t get what’s going on.”

He stresses that the suicide bombers are not “robots from another cultural world … they are from the same world as us – with some differences.”

Mr. Hamid, who now works part-time at a brand-management agency in London, knows that what he is embarking on with this novel is a rather large shift in American thinking, and he knows there are hurdles. For instance, what he perceives to be the U.S. media’s one-note portrayal of Arabs and Pakistanis.

“Our No.1 television talk-show host in Pakistan is a transvestite,” Mr. Hamid says. “We have a huge indie-rock band scene, we’ve got fashion models wearing next to nothing on catwalks; we’ve got huge ecstasy-fueled raves.” But you don’t see these things on American TV, he points out. We get “the guys in the caves instead.”

And for all the personal or imaginative narratives about Islam to emerge since Sept. 11, all too often, Mr. Hamid feels, they come from a certain perspective. “The ones [Americans] read are now almost solely from people who have chosen, often through the result of very unfortunate circumstances, to utterly reject that aspect of themselves. Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Salman Rushdie stories – it’s the we-hate-Islam Muslims.”

Or John Updike’s Terrorist, a book Mr. Hamid read with frustration. “What’s interesting about Terrorist is how deeply such a talented and gifted novelist can fail at a project,” Mr. Hamid argues. “He fails for the same reason that America as a project fails: that leap of empathy is just one step too far.”

The Reluctant Fundamentalist is his attempt to make the leap a little shorter, to be a bridge across a chasm that has been filled, already, with rhetoric. At less than 200 pages, it’s not much – but it’s something.

John Freeman is president of the National Book Critics Circle.


Kurt Vonnegut is dead at 84

April 12, 2007

nytimes.com

Kurt Vonnegut, Writer of Classics of the American Counterculture, Dies
at 84
By DINITIA SMITH

Kurt Vonnegut, whose dark comic talent and urgent moral vision in novels like “Slaughterhouse-Five,” “Cat’s Cradle” and “God Bless You,
Mr. Rosewater” caught the temper of his times and the imagination of a generation, died Wednesday night in Manhattan.

He was 84 and had homes in Manhattan and in Sagaponack on Long Island.

His death was reported by Morgan Entrekin, a longtime family friend,
who said Mr. Vonnegut suffered brain injuries as a result of a fall
several weeks ago.

Mr. Vonnegut wrote plays, essays and short fiction. But it was his novels that became classics of the American counterculture, making him a literary idol, particularly to students in the 1960s and ’70s.

Dog-eared paperback copies of his books could be found in the back
pockets of blue jeans and in dorm rooms on campuses throughout the
United States.

Like Mark Twain, Mr. Vonnegut used humor to tackle the basic questions of human existence: Why are we in this world? Is there a presiding figure to make sense of all this, a god who in the end, despite making people suffer, wishes them well?

He also shared with Twain a profound pessimism. “Mark Twain,” Mr.
Vonnegut wrote in his 1991 book, “Fates Worse Than Death: An
Autobiographical Collage,” “finally stopped laughing at his own agony
and that of those around him. He denounced life on this planet as a
crock. He died.”

Not all Mr. Vonnegut’s themes were metaphysical. With a blend of
vernacular writing, science fiction, jokes and philosophy, he also
wrote about the banalities of consumer culture, for example, or the
destruction of the environment.

His novels — 14 in all — were alternate universes, filled with
topsy-turvy images and populated by races of his own creation, like
the Tralfamadorians and the Mercurian Harmoniums. He invented
phenomena like chrono-synclastic infundibula (places in the universe
where all truths fit neatly together) as well as religions, like the
Church of God the Utterly Indifferent and Bokononism (based on the
books of a black British Episcopalian from Tobago “filled with
bittersweet lies,” a narrator says).

The defining moment of Mr. Vonnegut’s life was the firebombing of Dresden, Germany, by Allied forces in 1945, an event he witnessed firsthand as a young prisoner of war. Thousands of civilians were killed in the raids, many of them burned to death or asphyxiated. “The firebombing of Dresden,” Mr. Vonnegut wrote, “was a work of art.”

It was, he added, “a tower of smoke and flame to commemorate the rage and heartbreak of so many who had had their lives warped or ruined by the indescribable greed and vanity and cruelty of Germany.”

His experience in Dresden was the basis of “Slaughterhouse-Five,”
which was published in 1969 against the backdrop of war in Vietnam,
racial unrest and cultural and social upheaval. The novel, wrote the
critic Jerome Klinkowitz, “so perfectly caught America’s
transformative mood that its story and structure became best-selling
metaphors for the new age.”

To Mr. Vonnegut, the only possible redemption for the madness and apparent meaninglessness of existence was human kindness. The title character in his 1965 novel, “God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater,” summed up his philosophy:

“Hello, babies. Welcome to Earth. It’s hot in the summer and cold in
the winter. It’s round and wet and crowded. At the outside, babies,
you’ve got about a hundred years here. There’s only one rule that I
know of, babies — ‘God damn it, you’ve got to be kind.’ “

Mr. Vonnegut eschewed traditional structure and punctuation. His books were a mixture of fiction and autobiography, prone to one-sentence paragraphs, exclamation points and italics. Graham Greene called him “one of the most able of living American writers.” Some critics said he had invented a new literary type, infusing the science-fiction form with humor and moral relevance and elevating it to serious literature.

He was also accused of repeating himself, of recycling themes and
characters. Some readers found his work incoherent. His harshest
critics called him no more than a comic book philosopher, a purveyor
of empty aphorisms.

With his curly hair askew, deep pouches under his eyes and rumpled
clothes, he often looked like an out-of-work philosophy professor,
typically chain smoking, his conversation punctuated with coughs and
wheezes. But he also maintained a certain celebrity, as a regular on
panels and at literary parties in Manhattan and on the East End of
Long Island, where he lived near his friend and fellow war veteran
Joseph Heller, another darkly comic literary hero of the age.

Mr. Vonnegut was born in Indianapolis in 1922, a fourth-generation
German-American and the youngest of three children. His father, Kurt
Sr., was an architect. His mother, Edith, came from a wealthy brewery
family. Mr. Vonnegut’s brother, Bernard, who died in 1997, was a
physicist and an expert on thunderstorms.

During the Depression, the elder Vonnegut went for long stretches without work, and Mrs. Vonnegut suffered from episodes of mental illness. “When my mother went off her rocker late at night, the hatred and contempt she sprayed on my father, as gentle and innocent a man as ever lived, was without limit and pure, untainted by ideas or information,” Mr. Vonnegut wrote. She committed suicide, an act that haunted her son for the rest of his life.

He had, he said, a lifelong difficulty with women. He remembered an
aunt once telling him, ” ‘All Vonnegut men are scared to death of
women.’ “

“My theory is that all women have hydrofluoric acid bottled up
inside,” he wrote.

Mr. Vonnegut went east to attend Cornell University, but he enlisted
in the Army before he could get a degree. The Army initially sent him
to the Carnegie Institute of Technology (now Carnegie-Mellon) in
Pittsburgh and the University of Tennessee to study mechanical
engineering.

In 1944 he was shipped to Europe with the 106th Infantry Division and
shortly saw combat in the Battle of the Bulge. With his unit nearly
destroyed, he wandered behind enemy lines for several days until he
was captured and sent to a prisoner of war camp near Dresden, the
architectural jewel of Germany.

Assigned by his captors to make vitamin supplements, he was working
with other prisoners in an underground meat locker when British and
American war planes started carpet bombing the city, creating a
firestorm above him. The work detail saved his life.

Afterward, he and his fellow prisoners were assigned to remove the
dead.

“The corpses, most of them in ordinary cellars, were so numerous and
represented such a health hazard that they were cremated on huge
funeral pyres, or by flamethrowers whose nozzles were thrust into the
cellars, without being counted or identified,” he wrote in “Fates
Worse Than Death.”

When the war ended, Mr. Vonnegut returned to the United States and married his high school sweetheart, Jane Marie Cox. They settled in Chicago in 1945. The couple had three children: Mark, Edith and Nanette. In 1958, Mr. Vonnegut’s sister, Alice, and her husband died within a day of each other, she of cancer and he in a
train crash. The Vonneguts adopted their children, Tiger, Jim and Steven.

In Chicago, Mr. Vonnegut worked as a police reporter for the Chicago
City News Bureau. He also studied for a master’s degree in
anthropology at the University of Chicago, writing a thesis on “The
Fluctuations Between Good and Evil in Simple Tales.” It was rejected
unanimously by the faculty. (The university finally awarded him a
degree almost a quarter of a century later, allowing him to use his
novel “Cat’s Cradle” as his thesis.)

In 1947, he moved to Schenectady, N.Y., and took a job in public relations for the General Electric Company. Three years later he sold his first short story, “Report on the Barnhouse Effect,” to Collier’s magazine and decided to move his family to Cape Cod, Mass., where he wrote fiction for magazines like Argosy and The Saturday Evening Post.

To bolster his income, he taught emotionally disturbed children, worked at an advertising agency and at one point started an auto dealership.

His first novel was “Player Piano,” published in 1952. A satire on
corporate life — the meetings, the pep talks, the cultivation of
bosses — it also carries echoes of Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World.”
It concerns an engineer, Paul Proteus, who is employed by the Ilium
Works, a company similar to General Electric. Proteus becomes the
leader of a band of revolutionaries who destroy machines that they
think are taking over the world.

“Player Piano” was followed in 1959 by “The Sirens of Titan,” a
science fiction novel featuring the Church of God of the Utterly
Indifferent. In 1961 he published “Mother Night,” involving an
American writer awaiting trial in Israel on charges of war crimes in
Nazi Germany. Like Mr. Vonnegut’s other early novels, they were
published as paperback originals. And like “Slaughterhouse-Five,” in
1972, and a number of other Vonnegut novels, “Mother Night” was
adapted for film, in 1996, starring Nick Nolte.

In 1963, Mr. Vonnegut published “Cat’s Cradle.” Though it initially sold only about 500 copies, it is widely read today in high school English classes. The novel, which takes its title from an Eskimo game in which children try to snare the sun with string, is an autobiographical work about a family named Hoenikker. The narrator, an adherent of the religion Bokononism, is writing a book about the bombing of Hiroshima and comes to witness the destruction of the world by something called Ice-Nine, which, on contact, causes all water to freeze at room temperature.

Mr. Vonnegut shed the label of science fiction writer with “Slaughterhouse-Five.” It tells the story of Billy Pilgrim, an infantry scout (as Mr. Vonnegut was), who discovers the horror of war. “You know — we’ve had to imagine the war here, and we have imagined that it was being fought by aging men like ourselves,” an English
colonel says in the book. “We had forgotten that wars were fought by babies. When I saw those freshly shaved faces, it was a shock. My God, my God — I said to myself, ‘It’s the Children’s Crusade.’ “

As Mr. Vonnegut was, Billy is captured and assigned to manufacture vitamin supplements in an underground meat locker, where the prisoners take refuge from Allied bombing.

In “Slaughterhouse-Five,” Mr. Vonnegut introduced the recurring character of Kilgore Trout, his fictional alter ego. The novel also featured a signature Vonnegut phrase.

“Robert Kennedy, whose summer home is eight miles from the home I live in all year round,” Mr. Vonnegut wrote at the end of the book, “was shot two nights ago. He died last night. So it goes.

“Martin Luther King was shot a month ago. He died, too. So it goes.
And every day my Government gives me a count of corpses created by
military science in Vietnam. So it goes.”

One of many Zen-like words and phrases that run through Mr. Vonnegut’s books, “so it goes” became a catchphrase for opponents of the Vietnam war.

“Slaughterhouse-Five” reached No.1 on best-seller lists, making Mr.
Vonnegut a cult hero. Some schools and libraries have banned it
because of its sexual content, rough language and scenes of violence.

After the book was published, Mr. Vonnegut went into severe depression and vowed never to write another novel. Suicide was always a temptation, he wrote. In 1984, he tried to take his life with sleeping pills and alcohol.

“The child of a suicide will naturally think of death, the big one, as
a logical solution to any problem,” he wrote. His son Mark also
suffered a breakdown, in the 1970s, from which he recovered, writing
about it in a book, “Eden Express: A Memoir of Insanity.”

Forsaking novels, Mr. Vonnegut decided to become a playwright. His
first effort, “Happy Birthday, Wanda June,” opened Off Broadway in
1970 to mixed reviews. Around this time he separated from his wife,
Jane, and moved to New York. (She remarried and died in 1986.)

In 1979 Mr. Vonnegut married the photographer Jill Krementz. They have a daughter, Lily. They survive him, as do all his other children.

Mr. Vonnegut returned to novels with “Breakfast of Champions, or
Goodbye Blue Monday” (1973), calling it a “tale of a meeting of two
lonesome, skinny, fairly old white men on a planet which was dying fast.” This time his alter ego is Philboyd Sludge, who is writing a book about Dwayne Hoover, a wealthy auto dealer. Hoover has a breakdown after reading a novel written by Kilgore Trout, who reeappears in this book, and begins to believe that everyone around him is a robot.

In 1997, Mr. Vonnegut published “Timequake,” a tale of the millennium
in which a wrinkle in space-time compels the world to relive the
1990s. The book, based on an earlier failed novel of his, was, in his
own words, “a stew” of plot summaries and autobiographical writings.
Once again, Kilgore Trout is a character. “If I’d wasted my time
creating characters,” Mr. Vonnegut said in defense of his “recycling,”
“I would never have gotten around to calling attention to things that
really matter.”

Though it was a bestseller, it also met with mixed reviews. “Having a
novelist’s free hand to write what you will does not mean you are
entitled to a free ride,” R. Z. Sheppard wrote in Time. But the
novelist Valerie Sayers, in The New York Times Book Review, wrote:
“The real pleasure lies in Vonnegut’s transforming his continuing
interest in the highly suspicious relationship between fact and
fiction into the neatest trick yet played on a publishing world
consumed with the furor over novel versus memoir.”

Mr. Vonnegut said in the prologue to “Timequake” that it would be his
last novel. And so it was.

His last book, in 2005, was a collection of biographical essays, “A
Man Without a Country.” It, too, was a best seller.

In concludes with a poem written by Mr. Vonnegut called “Requiem,”
which has these closing lines:

When the last living thing

has died on account of us,

how poetical it would be

if Earth could say,

in a voice floating up

perhaps

from the floor

of the Grand Canyon,

“It is done.”

People did not like it here.


An Activist Returns To The Novel

March 13, 2007

The Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)

An Activist Returns To The Novel
by Randeep Ramesh

MANY HAD WRITTEN off the chances that Arundhati Roy would return to the world of fiction. Her astounding first novel, The God of Small Things, won the Booker in 1997. Ten years and 6 million copies later there was still no repeat of the lyrical, whirling debut.

Instead Roy turned to lobbing literary Molotov cocktails at Enron, George Bush’s war on terror and the World Trade Organisation in the form of incendiary polemics. No one could accuse her of having writers’ block: she churned out six books, collections of her essays with titles such as Power Politics and An Ordinary Person’s Guide to Empire.

Dispensing with story-writing, she pursued a career in social activism, appearing at anti-war rallies and using her celebrity to raise the profiles of unfashionable causes – Kashmiris on death row, the rights of tribal communities in India, hardscrabble suicides in the country’s farming belt.

But recently the 45-year-old quietly announced that she would be stepping back from the public stage to write her second novel. The last person to know, apparently, was her agent, David Godwin, who had negotiated for her a million-dollar advance for The God of Small Things. “David rang me saying, ‘Why did you not tell me? I have had hundreds of calls from publishers.’ I thought it was so funny, I mean let’s have a bidding war for a non-existent book,” Roy says.

Sitting in her Delhi rooftop flat, whose dark tiled and light wood-lined interior the former architecture student designed, Roy says she has already begun writing the new novel but has no idea when it will be finished. The whisper was that it would be about Kashmir, the revolt-scarred Himalayan state, but Roy shakes her head sending ripples through her grey-flecked curls. “It is not true. My fiction is never about an issue. I don’t set myself some political task and weave a story around it. I might as well write a straightforward nonfiction piece if that is what I wanted to do.”

A clue about where Roy is heading may be gleaned from her current reading. On her coffee table rests a book by Bono, while at her bedside are works by the radical American founding father Thomas Paine and Victorian novelist Charles Dickens. What these two writers share is their defence of the French Revolution, and an empathy with the lower classes who pulled down the ruling elite. “In so many ways Paris then could be Delhi now. It is a conceit to think that all that we say is new and original.”

Roy says India today, like pre-revolutionary France, is poised “on the edge of violence”. As she sees it, the country of her birth is not coming together but coming apart – convulsed by “corporate globalisation” at an unprecedented, unacceptable velocity. “The inequalities become untenable.”

Roy says she is not taking refuge from her politics in the world of literature. She answers her own door and makes guests tea herself, remarkable in a country where even middle-class households have servants. She is still married to filmmaker Pradip Krishen but the flat is “her space”. He lives in another house.

“Living with my own contradictions is hard enough – forcing my political views on someone else, on their lifestyle and the choices they make is not something I want to do. It distorts a relationship beyond redemption. So, I decided to have my own place.”

Roy’s dire predictions about India have left her isolated when mainstream opinion seems convinced that the country, with its nuclear bombs and slick Bollywood movies, is the next superpower-in-waiting. Roy says some parts of the country, such as the western state of Gujarat – the scene of a bloody pogrom against Muslims five years ago – are off limits to her because of her campaigning.

A few years ago she was briefly imprisoned for contempt of court while protesting against the country’s controversial Narmada Dam project. The God of Small Things produced obscenity charges and a court case that ran for a decade, only to be dismissed last month.

She first shot to prominence in 1994 with a scathing film review entitled The Great Indian Rape Trick, about the movie Bandit Queen, in which she questioned the right to “restage the rape of a living woman without her permission”.

Roy has been consistent in her view that writers have a responsibility to their subjects. She says she could not read the blockbuster Maximum City, a portrait of Mumbai by expatriate Indian writer Suketu Mehta, because the book contains a passage in which the writer is a bystander while people in custody are beaten and tortured by the city’s police.

“When you witness torture you are seeing someone humiliated. In front of you. It is not a neutral act. Certainly you have the permission of the torturer, but you do not have the permission of the tortured [to record it].”

Unlike other Indian-born writers who have relocated to the US and Europe, Roy is determined to remain a thorn in the side of the establishment in India. “Here you see what’s happening. People are driven out of villages, driven out of the cities, there’s a kind of insanity in the air and all of it held down by our mesmeric, pelvic-thrusting Bollywood movies. The Indian middle class has just embarked on this orgy of consumerism.”

But she admits that the kinds of non-violent protests she has taken part in for a decade have failed in India, a republic founded on the Gandhi-ite principles of peaceful resistance. “I am not such an uninhibited fan of Gandhi. After all, Gandhi was a superstar. When he went on a hunger strike he was a superstar on a hunger strike. But I don’t believe in superstar politics. If people in a slum are on a hunger strike, no one gives a shit.”

Roy says activists have been “exhausted” by their attempts to influence the courts and the press and now says she does not “condemn people taking up arms” in the face of state repression.

“It would be immoral for me to preach violence unless I were prepared to resort to it myself. But equally, it is immoral for me to advocate feelgood marches and hunger strikes when I’m not bearing the brunt of unspeakable violence. I certainly do not volunteer to tell Iraqis or Kashmiris or Palestinians that if they went on a mass hunger strike they would get rid of the military occupation. Civil disobedience doesn’t seem to be paying dividends.”

Instead of the Indian state caving in to the moral righteousness of the numerous causes Roy supports, she says it merely moved to co-opt its adversaries. The power of argument, even in the world’s biggest democracy, has been shrunk by the argument of power.

Roy says she was aghast to learn that a fellow Indian environmental campaigner accepted a million-dollar award from the transnational metals firm Alcan, which has been accused of grabbing tribal land in eastern India. The tentacles of big business have learned to embrace non-government organisations. The result, she claims, is that the charitable trusts of Tata, India’s largest private company, fund “half the activists in the country”.

She feels frustrated by the state’s ability to brush aside non-violent resistance movements. “This has sapped the energy from people’s movements. The very Gandhian Narmada movement [the grassroots group which campaigned against big dams in India] knocked on the door of every democratic institution for years and has been humiliated. It has not managed to stop a single dam from going ahead. In fact the dam industry has a new spring in its step.”

Roy says she had given ideological opponents a handy hate figure. “In India I’m portrayed more as a hysterical, lying, anti-national harridan.

“In this adversarial game that goes on, you can get pinned down to spewing facts and numbers, but those are not the only truths … I’ve done that. I’ve fought that battle,” she says. “But the distillation of those things into literature is a different kind of intervention.”

Copyright © 2007. The Sydney Morning Herald


Borges

February 7, 2007

Jorge Luis Borges

Can a great writer be blind to the world around him?
By Clive James

Jorge Luis Borges was born in Buenos Aires in 1899 and died there in 1986, near the end of a century that he had lived almost all the way through and done a great deal to shape. If we now think of Latin American literature as central to the Spanish world, and of the Spanish world as a vitally renewed force in the world entire, it has a lot to do with Borges. As a 20th-­century master artist, he was celebrated even by 19th-­century standards—famous on the scale of Tennyson, Kipling, and Mark Twain. By the end of his life, his every spoken word got into print: Dialogues with Borges appeared in The New Yorker as fast as they were recorded in Buenos Aires. By “The White Whale,” of course, Borges meant Moby-Dick. (He was often very approximate about the details of his enthusiasm for literature in English.)

When I encountered this idea of Borges’—that the whole world is, or should be, our country—I was wondering already if the idea, so attractive on the face of it to a displaced person like myself, was really quite right.

Before interrogating Borges about his politics, it is wise, as it were, to go crazy about him first.

Full article